EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

​

Clinical Women’s Research (CWR) is an interdisciplinary women’s health and safety research institution founded by Women's Research Scientist Sade Eastmond and grounded in the convergent disciplines of cognitive behavioral neuroscience, sociocultural anthropology, clinical research science, public policy analysis, and urban health science.

 

CWR operates as both a clinical research enterprise and an applied public health intervention model, advancing evidence-based solutions to the global crisis of violence against women and its measurable biological, neurological, and societal consequences.

 

Clinical Women’s Research seeks funding to expand its integrated model across New York City. Funding will support the development of clinical and community-based research initiatives, expansion of evidence-based women's safety programming, production of digital education and prevention tools, advancement of survivor-centered health frameworks, and scaling of research and policy infrastructure. Funding will also sustain ongoing ethnographic fieldwork and clinical documentation, ensuring all interventions remain grounded in the lived, biological, and structural realities of the populations served.

 

STATEMENT OF NEED

​

Women’s safety is a clinical and public health crisis with measurable neurological, physiological, and intergenerational consequences. New York City recorded 249,077 Domestic Incident Reports in 2024, 9,953 sex crimes, and 1,341 rapes (NYC ENDGBV, 2024). Sixty-six domestic violence homicides occurred that year, and domestic violence accounted for 16.5% of all murders over the past decade (NYC ENDGBV, 2024). Black women represented 31.2% of intimate partner homicide victims while comprising 13% of the population (NYC ENDGBV, 2024). The Bronx recorded the highest per-capita rates of rape and sexual violence, and 77% of rapes occurred in residential settings (NYC ENDGBV, 2024).

 

The clinical consequences extend far beyond immediate harm. Over 75% of domestic violence survivors sustain traumatic brain injuries that frequently go undiagnosed (Valera et al., 2019). The estimated 1.6 million brain injuries annually among survivors exceed those sustained by athletes and military personnel combined (Valera et al., 2019). PTSD produces measurable neurobiological disruption, including epigenetic changes associated with intergenerational trauma transmission (Yehuda et al., 2016). High ACE scores are strongly correlated with increased risk of depression, chronic disease, and reduced life expectancy (Felitti et al., 1998).

 

This establishes a critical reality:
Violence against women is a biological crisis with social determinants. Structural factors intensify vulnerability. Domestic violence is the leading cause of family homelessness in New York City (41% of shelter entries), while housing instability, eviction, and economic abuse systematically undermine women’s ability to achieve safety (NYC Comptroller, 2019; NYC ENDGBV, 2024; CDC, 2022). Globally, one in three women will experience physical or sexual violence (WHO, 2024), with a lifetime economic burden of $3.6 trillion in the United States alone (Peterson et al., 2018). The scale and complexity of this crisis require an intervention model that is clinical, data-driven, community-embedded, and policy-oriented, the model Clinical Women’s Research is designed to deliver.

 

ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW

​

Clinical Women’s Research was founded on the principle that women’s health and safety must be addressed through scientific rigor, clinical inquiry, and community-grounded intervention.

The organization operates as a hybrid research and implementation institution, integrating:

• Clinical women's research methodologies

• Community-based participatory research

• Applied safety programming

• Policy analysis and advocacy

Led by Research Scientist Sade Eastmond, a Master’s Candidate at the City University of New York whose work has been recognized by Alpha Kappa Delta, the International Sociology Honor Society, CWR is grounded in a multidisciplinary methodological framework that includes ethnography, autoethnography, clinical research, and journalistic documentation. Clinical Women’s Research is designed as a scalable infrastructure, capable of producing both immediate safety outcomes and long-term systemic transformation.

 

PROGRAM DESIGN & EVIDENCE BASE

​

All CWR programming is derived from established clinical, behavioral, and public health evidence and continuously refined through original research.

 

The model integrates:

• Resistance education programs shown to significantly reduce sexual assault (Senn et al., 2015)

• Cognitive and behavioral science frameworks for situational awareness and threat recognition

• Evidence identifying boundary-setting and relational competence as core safety infrastructure (Hollander & Cunningham, 2020)

• Trauma-informed approaches grounded in neurobiological recovery (Yehuda et al., 2016)

• Community-level intervention models demonstrating large-scale reductions in violence (Green Dot, 2024)

CWR’s distinguishing feature is the integration of these approaches within a clinical research framework, enabling continuous measurement, validation, and refinement.

 

RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION

​

Clinical Women’s Research embeds original research as a central operational function.

Primary research areas include:

• Neurological and physiological impacts of violence

• Structural determinants of women’s safety (housing, economics, policy)

• Urban health and community wellbeing

• Intersections of environment, biology, and safety

Methodologies include:

• Ethnographic fieldwork

• Clinical research protocols

• Community-based participatory research

• Photojournalistic documentation

This work contributes to a broader research agenda, including the development of a New York City Case Study and a publication series examining women’s health and safety across urban environments.

 

GOALS & OBJECTIVES

​

CWR’s goals are organized across five pillars:

Resilience. Autonomy. Awareness. Wellbeing. Community.

• Develop and deliver clinically grounded safety curricula with measurable improvements in participant outcomes

• Expand programming access in underserved communities

• Build a scalable digital education and prevention platform

• Advance survivor-centered health and recovery initiatives

• Produce research that informs policy and institutional practice

 

CONCLUSION​

​

Clinical Women’s Research reframes women’s safety as a clinical, biological, and structural condition requiring scientific intervention.

The neurological impact of violence is measurable. Its intergenerational transmission is documented. Its economic cost is quantifiable. What remains insufficient is the scale of response.​ Clinical Women’s Research provides that response.

​

Investment in CWR supports:

• Reduction in violence

• Improved health and neurological outcomes

• Stronger community safety infrastructure

• Evidence-based policy transformation

This work is measurable, scalable, and necessary.​ 

Your funding makes it possible.

​

REFERENCES​

​

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Intimate partner violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html

Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8

Gothamist. (2024, January). Brooklyn sees dramatic spike in evictions as housing crisis worsens.

Green Dot. (2024). About the Green Dot model. https://www.greendotprogram.org

Hollander, J. A., & Cunningham, S. E. (2020). Life skills and boundary-setting as safety infrastructure. In P. A. Frazier & C. C. Ward (Eds.), Sexual violence against women and girls (pp. 149–171). American Psychological Association.

New York City Comptroller. (2019). The cost of homelessness: A report to the New York City Council. Office of the NYC Comptroller.

NYC End Gender-Based Violence (ENDGBV). (2024). 2024 data on domestic violence, sexual assault, and gender-based violence in New York City. New York City Mayor's Office to End Domestic and Gender-Based Violence.

Peterson, C., Kearns, M. C., McIntosh, W. L., Estefan, L. F., Nicolaidis, C., McCollister, K. E., Gordon, A., & Florence, C. (2018). Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.017

Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., & Hobden, K. L. (2015). Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(24), 2326–2335. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1411131

Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Hobden, K. L., Newby-Clark, I. R., Barata, P. C., Radtke, H. L., & Thurston, W. E. (2017). Secondary and 2-year outcomes of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317690119

Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., Edwards, K., & Hobden, K. L. (2021). Testing a model of how a sexual assault resistance education program for women reduces sexual assaults. Psychology of Violence, 11(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000351

Valera, E. M., Cao, Z., Pasternak, O., Shenton, M. E., Kubicki, M., Makris, N., & Adra, N. (2019). White matter correlates of mild traumatic brain injuries in women subjected to intimate-partner violence: A preliminary study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 36(5), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5734

Valera, E. M., Campbell, J., Gill, J., & Iverson, K. M. (2019). Correlates of brain injuries in women subjected to intimate partner violence: Identifying the dangers and raising awareness. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1581864

World Health Organization. (2024). Violence against women: Data and figures. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., & Binder, E. B. (2016). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry, 80(5), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005